|
|
|
||||||
| |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Freshwater fishes [Diversity] [Biogeography] [Hydrographic units] [Water masses] [Depth] [Sediments] [Wetlands] [Local richness] [Rarity] [Conservation status] [Diversity and conservation] |
Saltwater fishes [Diversity] [Biogeography] [Salinity gradient] [Aquatic physiographic units] [Distance from the shore] [Depth] [Sediments] [Local richness] [Rarity] [Conservation status] [Diversity and conservation] |
||||||||||||||||||
| Saltwater fishes of the St. Lawrence: sediments |
|||||||||||||||||||
The species richness associated with the various types of sediments corresponds fairly well to that predicted by the regional model. In the largest units, gravelly sands appear to be a little poorer in species than sandy pelites. For the smaller units, three sediment types seem to be poorer in species: medium to coarse-grained sand, fine sand and gravel.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
The existence of fish assemblages based on sediment texture was confirmed by a habitat selection analysis. Most species favoured certain types of sediments and avoided others. The fact that these two methods provided similar results greatly increased our confidence in this type of assemblage.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||